Form submitted successfully, thank you.

Error submitting form, please try again.

77 Prints bio picture

So you want to know about me?

Let's start with the basics: my name is Clare and I live in Dallas. Here are a few random facts that might help you understand who I am... 

- Received my BA in Art from Rhodes College but begged them to say "Art History" for my parents' benefit when I graduated. No dice.

- Wrote my senior thesis on this painting during my junior year while everyone else was in Florida on Spring Break. 11 years later and I'm still bitter.

- Interned at a small gallery where I was privileged enough to have works by Ansel Adams, Dorothea Lange, Walker Evans and Lewis Hine at my fingertips. Got valuable first hand experience on how to deal with a certain shipping service when they destroyed a rare painting in transit to another gallery.

- Would give anything for the chance to be a concert photographer for a summer or twelve.

 Now Booking For Fall 2010! Please contact me to reserve your spot today!

77 Prints will be closed from November 30th, 2010 - January 16th, 2011.

{ why it takes me so long to edit photos }

One of the hardest things about the past year was finding my “look”. There’s nothing wrong with a crisp, saturated, fully focused photo. In fact, I’m pretty sure it’s the look most people are going for when they’re snapping pictures from day to day. While I do want my photos to be in focus, I’m not overly concerned about the rest. I would pore over websites and blogs looking at other photographers’ photos and it felt like they all looked the same. Rich, saturated, super sharp photos, with creamy almost fake looking overblown skin  (this is huge pet peeve of mine). I don’t know where I saw my first “hazy vintage” (that’s what I call it, anyway) photo, but I was immediately drawn to it. I’m not saying there aren’t a lot of people out there doing that look, but it’s certainly not as prevalent in family photography as the more traditional saturated look.

So I starting working on my own “recipes” to get the look I wanted. Turns out that recipe has to be tweaked with every shoot. Sometimes I can use the same ingredients over an entire set of photos, but sometimes it doesn’t work and then I find myself adjusting the recipe, photo by photo. And the real kicker is that I could do this for HOURS. Not because I didn’t get it right the first time, but because I just love playing around with variations on a single photo. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve taken a photo and run a few edits on it and said, “perfect”. And then for some reason I’ll start over again, do a whole new set of edits and go “oh I like that even better.” And then take it back to the beginning and do ANOTHER totally different look which I hate. And then I’ll say, “I liked that second one… now how in the world did I do it?” Because by that time you’ve tweaked every slider, every channel, every color, every level, and you can’t remember how you got there. So then you just have to start all over again and hope you get close.

As a result, I have a hard time getting a set to look like a cohesive collection. It’s extremely frustrating, but refining my editing process is way up there at the top of my resolution list for this year. I am hopeful that this workshop I’m attending next week will help me in that effort.

Anyway. This is a photo (not a particularly good one) that I took this weekend. Just watch and laugh as you see my brain at work here – as frustrating as this process can be, I’d be lying if I didn’t say it was fun. It’s like painting a new picture every 5 minutes.

Original (or SOOC, straight out of the camera) – and to give you some background, it was a very overcast day, so the second one is really quite misleading. Which bothers me.

trees1

Bringing out the colors, warming it up, adding a sky where there was none (but screwing it up around the top branches)…

trees2

And then washing it all out…

trees4

And finally, a completely desaturated take.

trees3

See? Every one of them different. But I don’t really dislike any of them. I just can’t stop myself from messing with it over and over again. I’m not sure what the point of this post is, but just imagine this process times however many photos I take in one afternoon of your family. Do you see the challenge?

January 20, 2010 - 1:00 pm Bo Nash - I suffer from this compulsion, too. In fact, if I have some time to waste I'll sometimes find myself digging through the archives and find a set I haven't touched in a year. Then I'll process a photo or two using techniques I didn't know or wasn't into back then. It's a great way to accidentally waste an evening. Are you using some of the NIK filters on these?

January 20, 2010 - 1:46 pm Clare - no, and the only thing keeping me from checking those out is that I fear it would slow me down even more! I have a LOT of PS Actions that I've picked up, though. I need to pare them down, I don't use 80% of them.

January 20, 2010 - 11:25 pm Bo Nash - Yeah, there's a ton of good stuff on those sets, but I only use about 6 or 7 on a regular basis. That last shot looks a lot like the effect you get from the "Antique Plate" filter in their Silver EFX Pro set, though. Also, it is my favorite. I'd put that on the wall.

January 21, 2010 - 4:42 pm Patty - This post made me giggle because this is EXACTLY what you used to do in college. You'd write a lenghty paper and then decide around midnight to scrap it all and start again. Some how you always managed to finish, although I'll never konw how - I would never have finished on time! Looks like the writing was on the wall early, so-to-speak!

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*